Kadrey v. Meta
Parallel track to other LLM training cases; tests whether Meta's open-release strategy changes market harm analysis.
CopyrightFederalWatchingFiled / active 2023U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Procedural posture
Consolidated author suits against Meta regarding LLaMA training data; motion practice on fair use and direct infringement (placeholder).
Facts
Plaintiffs allege Meta trained LLaMA models on copyrighted works without authorization, including materials from shadow libraries (placeholder).
Legal issues
- Direct infringement via creation of training copies
- Fair use and transformative purpose of LLM training
- Market harm to licensing and derivative markets
Holding
Pending — no final merits holding (placeholder).
Reasoning
Early decisions focus on pleading standards and class certification; fair use analysis ongoing (placeholder).
Why it matters for AI law
Parallel track to other LLM training cases; tests whether Meta's open-release strategy changes market harm analysis.
Related content
Aidicia is an educational legal research portfolio. It does not provide legal advice, create a lawyer-client relationship, or replace advice from a licensed attorney.